While I really like Brandy’s format for posting every day I thought I’d try to mix it up a little and do mine differently just so we get some thoughts coming together from a few different angles. So, what I’m hoping to do is write a brief summary of each subsection in Barth’s various segments of the CD and then give one of my favorite quotes from the section. Perhaps I’ll include some of my own thoughts and evaluation at the end. We’ll see how this goes when we get to the longer sections, but for now lets just plunge in.
For today that gives me §1: The Task of Dogmatics and §2: The Task of Prolegmena to Dogmatics.
§1.1 The Church, Theology, Science
Summary: Theology, Barth argues, is the self-examination of the church regarding the content of what it claims about God. Theology, for Barth, is interrogatory, it subjects the church to self-examination in light of the God that the gospel proclaims. As such theology is primarily a self-critical discipline rather than an apologetic, or an attempt to synthesize other human disciplines into a scientific whole. In fact, for Barth, whatever relationship there might be between theology and other human sciences isn’t really that big of a deal. The point is that theology, fundamentally, is about subjecting ourselves to judgment on the basis of the revelation of God in Jesus Christ.
Money Quote: “Theology does not in fact possess special keys to special doors. Nor does it control a basis of knowledge which might not find actualisation in other sciences. Nor does it know an object of enquiry necessarily concealed from other sciences. Only by failing to recognise the actualisation of revelation, the possibility of grace and therefore its own nature, could it possibly make any such claim.” (p. 5)
§1.2 Dogmatics as an Enquiry
Summary: First of all, since theology is a form of inquiry, that assumes that the truth about God can in fact be known by human beings. This assumption is made in the act of faith in Jesus Christ who “in His revelation gives Himself to faith” (p. 12) However, this means that Christian talk about God must constantly be tested by its conformity to Christ, an always ambiguous and uncertain enterprise. Ultimately it is “the freely acting God Himself and alone” who is “the truth of revelation” (p. 15-16). All our theological efforts can never be accorded the authority that ultimately belongs to the free and living Lord.
Money Quote: “Dogmatics is possible only as theologia crucis, in the act of obedience which is certain in faith, but which for this very reason is humble, always being thrown back to the beginning and having to make a fresh start. It is not possible as an effortless triumph or intermittent labour. It always takes place on the narrow way which leads from the enacted revelation to the promised revelation.” (p. 14)
§1.3 Dogmatics as an Act of Faith
Summary: Theology is an act of faith. It is undertaken by those who have been called together by Jesus Christ (the church). But faith itself is the “gracious address of God to [hu]man[ity], the free personal presence of Jesus Christ in his activity” (p. 18). As such dogmatics assumes not a human capacity or disposition, but rather depends wholly on the free, gracious, and present action of God in Christ. And thus the church cannot guarantee the possibility of doing dogmatics at all. It should set out to examine itself, interrogate itself, and strive for faithfulness, but it can only do so on the basis of hope, hope that God will be present, active, and will free us up in grace to speak rightly about the truth of the gospel. As such theological work must be understood finally as prayer (p. 23).
Money Quote: “Prayer can be the recognition that we accomplish nothing by our intentions, even though they be intentions to pray. Prayer can be the expression of our human willing of the will of God. Prayer can signify that for good or evil [hu]man[ity]justifies God and not himself. Prayer can be the human answer to the divine hearing already granted, the epitome of the true faith which we cannot assume of ourselves. We do not speak of true prayer if we say ‘must’ instead of ‘can.’” (p. 24)
Brandy Daniels
signonthewindow
Nate Kerr
Halden
Steven D
peterkline
I like the money quote idea. It’s impressive that you can choose just one quote per section, its hard for me to limit it to three or four….
Pingback: Church Dogmatics §1 Comments | Inhabitatio Dei
I just found this link on Kirk’s Reading through Barth and you commented on a phrase that I have a question about.
“The point is that theology, fundamentally, is about subjecting ourselves to judgment on the basis of the revelation of God in Jesus Christ.”
I would like to know what is being identifed as the “revelation of God in Jesus Christ,” specifically is this referring to Christ as presented in the Old and New Testament, or another concept that I’m not aware of at this point in reading.
As I had said, I started the reading on Kirk’s page, but I really like the dialy reading of 15 pages and a two year schedule. I hope my quesiton is clear, and thanks for all your thoughts and effort in the clear presentation on the readings.
I should also add that I’m not familar with Barth’s writings, however, I do want to continue in this study of ‘theology’ and especially ‘dogmatics’ as defined by Bart as the ‘dogmas’ of the church.
Ken
Ken, by “revelation of God in Jesus Christ” I believe Barth is referring, specifically to the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, as witnessed by Scripture, which is, by faith, understood to be the reality of God with us and for us.
Scripture as witness to Christ is certainly part of the picture, but a key point for Barth is that it is God in Christ, that reality itself, which reveals itself. And it does so not simply through Scripture or the church, but through whatever God might commandeer.